Jesus Item ID: #108Jesus Among Other Gods: The Absolute Claims of the Christian Message NOW $0.00
Quantity: In Stock and Ready to Ship! Product Information: From Publishers Weekly Item Description
From Publishers Weekly When Pope John Paul II called for a massive “new evangelization” of Asia during a November 1999 visit to India, his comments sparked protest from Hindus for whom proselytizing is a form of oppression. The debate underscored the sharp difference between Western creeds such as Christianity and Islam, which tend to be exclusive, and Eastern religions that stress pluralism. This collision forms a fascinating story line, and on that basis Zacharias’s new work is superficially intriguing. Zacharias, a Christian apologist who grew up in India, does offer the occasional insight into Eastern religions. He claims that despite the current Hollywood romance with Buddhism as a simple faith of compassion, in most forms Buddhism is actually a complex system, featuring 227 disciplinary rules for men and 311 for women. Yet for the most part, Zacharias is in dialogue here not with Eastern religions but with Western skeptics. He seeks to settle old scores with Darwi… Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. Item Reviews2 Responses to “Jesus Among Other Gods: The Absolute Claims of the Christian Message”Leave a Reply |
WAS 
$7.99 
WAS 
WAS 
WAS 
How to Make Money and Spend It Gods Way (Dr. Kent Hovind - Creation Science Evangelism) $12.00 
Unbinding the Gospel: Real Life Evangelism, 2nd Edition
WAS |
View Large Image
Bookmark This Page
Email A Friend
Print This Page
Help With This Item
This review is from: Jesus Among Other Gods: The Absolute Claims Of The Christian Message (Hardcover)
I write this mainly in response to the first review of this book. The person’s first critique of the book was that Ravi had treated Buddha as a god, whereas he was not nor did he claim to be. Two quotes from the book I think will suffice to show how this misrepresents the ideas expressed in the book, and begs the question, has this person read this book, and if so, how carefully did they read it? On page 5, Ravi refers to Buddhism as a “non theistic, if not atheistic religion. ” Again on page 90 in reference to Buddha’s stance on allowing women as disciples, Ravi says, “Whatever one may make of all this, we must be clear that in a non-theistic system, which Buddhism is. . . . “Implicit in both of these statements is the realization that Buddha did not claim divine status, rendering the argument made by the first reviewer inaccurate. I found the book to be compelling, and the information presented, clearly demonstrated the uniqueness of the message of Christ when contrasted against other prevailing worldviews. In reference to the comment about Ravi’s hypocrisy, I would merely point out the lack of differentiation between an argument and a person. If indeed one man fails to live up to the claims of Christ, which the bible clearly states is impossible for man without divine intervention, the message itself is not compromised. Especially when the inability of man to do so is implicit in the message. The message of Christ stands on its own even in light of the attacks of its critics from all sides, and in light of the failure of His followers. (It should be noted that I am not at all implying that Ravi is a failure. )First, the first reviewer is basing his/her claim of Dr. Zacharias’ hypocrisy on a request in a review that he may never see, responding to a person who included no address to which to mail a check. Second, The argument is based on a person’s obedience to a command; not the validity of the one who gave the command, therefore, the criticism fails to disprove the christian message. Third, the argument seems to be a verbal smokescreen composed of second-hand doubt to hide behind in order to justify the refusal to come to terms with the personal implications of the christian message being true. I mean this in no way to offend the reviewer. The book, which I think was excellent, discussed how Jesus’ claims are unique, and would not have been made by the founders of any other religion. My personal favorite chapter was entitled “a taste for the soul. ” In this chapter, Ravi points out how Jesus constantly pointed people to a need that was deeper than their physical hunger, to a spiritual hunger that everyone has. He goes on to say that when Jesus says he is the bread of life he is establishing himself as the source of satisfaction, and is actually positing himself as his message. In other words Jesus doesn’t point us to satisfaction; he is our satisfaction. As Ravi points out, other founders of religions offer ways to peace or satisfaction, etc. , whereas Jesus says,” I am the way. “I have consistently found Ravi’s writings to be stimulating reading, engaging both the heart and the mind. I would heartily recommend this book to both Christians who are looking for help in learning to defend their faith, and to nonchristians who may be trying to see if the Christian worldview is indeed an intellectually coherent one. As Ravi points out doubt is often a product of ones background every bit as much as faith often is. So the automatic dismissal of anything supernatural often carries with it as many prejudices and presuppositions as faith is accused of carrying. So to anyone who will come and read objectively, I believe you will find a compelling case that the claims of Christ are intellectually tenable, and healing to the soul.
Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)
Jesus is Someone who is referenced somehow by every religion in the world. From Hindus to Muslims and the cults based in America, there is no doubt that having Jesus as part of one’s theology is vital. In this book Ravi Zacharias explains whether or not there is any valid claim to truth and Christ in any other religion but Christianity. Ravi has good stories to tell, writing like an expository preacher with clear, easy-to-understand points. His illustrations are vivid. I guess my only complaint is that he could have tackled the “absolute claims of the Christian message” via a more systematic breakdown with each particular religion. He was continually referring to the Buddhist, Hindu, and others (especially with pantheist ideas), but unless you had previous knowledge of these religions and what they taught, it would seem that the typical layperson would have had trouble keeping up. Still, while it does not get too deep, there is plenty of meat here, and I think the book is very much worth a read. Ravi is a clear evangelical voice in the wilderness, and I appreciate his logic and stand for truth.